The Llano Ledger


Newsletter Text V87

Accessing The Llano Ledger Website Without Generously Providing Financial Assistance To This Publication Not Only Denies Desperately Needed Funds For Investigative Expenses, But Amounts To Theft Of This Writer's Labor.

BANNER AND POP-UP ADVERTISING PAYS ONLY FOR WEBSITE

***
Want this publication to continue? Send a financial donation to Rt 2 Box 464A, Buchanan Dam, Tx. 78609. The clock is ticking...
***

**************April 9, 2001***************

This publication is, and always has been, a forum for ideas and their exchange in the community. Space has been offered to all candidates for office, including the School Board. Normally, any correspondence received would be posted on Reader Letters. Since there have been disturbing developments in the May 5, 2001 race, however, a letter from School Board Place 2 Candidate Fred Mraz will be posted in its entirety in this Newsletter.

The letter is in response to three questions asked by this writer regarding Mr. Mraz's bid for office. Following the letter, readers will be advised of disturbing allegations brought to the attention of this publication by the candidate. An investigation by The Ledger has indeed begun:
***************

These three questions I have been asked: Why am I running? Well, I've lived in Llano County for several years and have willingly participated with our youth, seeking to do all I can to give them a direction in life and love for learning, and how to be someone and something!

Since doing so, I've found that the kids in Llano County have been dealt a raw deal in which they have no voice and been wrongly accused in many cases I have followed. School officials seem to glorify themselves in punishing, rather than being fair in how it's administered. Basically, selective discipline!

In this unjust world, we definitely need discipline, but just as importantly we need people who will administer discipline fairly to all. And these administrators have to be held accountable for the actions they take.

I've noticed there is no PTA. Nor parent-teacher cooperation, other than the faculty speaks and the parents are to listen. This must cease. We as parents are the first line of defense for our children, teaching them right from wrong. When our rights as parents become void, we all lose.

These are some of the things I believe Llano ISD would love to have happen: Waive all parental and student rights. Believe no word that comes out of our children's mouths. This has been a way of life for Llano County kids.

Well, I say no more. I intend to run for the Board and stand as a taxpaying parent to give all parents a voice in what takes place in their children's education. And see to it all school officials and personnel are held accountable!

Second question that was asked of me: How am I qualified? Good question. Well first, I've been a parent for better than half my life doing everything I could to teach my kids right from wrong!

Second, over the last twenty years I have taken in more troubled kids, adults, and families than I can count, in need of someone to provide, if nothing more than a positive influence of hope!

Third, it has come to my attention there have been many other kids besides my own who have had raw dealings with some of our great "faculty" and "supervisors". Many of these students have been dealt with selective discipline. There have been reports of ridicule to the point where parents have sought other alternatives to have their children educated.

Fourth, as a taxpayer from whom Llano County expects to make a small fortune over the rest of my life, I feel I have the right to see to it that I get the most for my money. For all kids, created equal under God. And that our children be treated properly and with respect by school officials, as school officials would expect from our children.

Fifth, I've been a strong influence upon adults and kids of all ages, urging them to strive to be the best they can be, to understand they have a voice, and that if you speak enough, you will be heard. And if you see something wrong, the only way to fix it is to get involved. That's why I'm running for office!

Sixth, I have the requisite "tools", the ability, and determination to give the people back a voice. A say over what happens to their children as well as the taxpayers.

Third question asked was: Precisely, what will you do if elected? All I can to see to it that the children of Llano County have all the tools needed to succeed in life. To give back the parents a voice so that they might not be taken so lightly. To provide parents and taxpayers the knowledge of how our children are being taught, how school funds are being spent, and to hold all school personnel accountable for their actions.

Fred Mraz
Candidate, School Board Place 2
Kingsland April 9, 2001
*******************************

Mr. Mraz has approached this writer with disturbing allegations that School officials may have deliberately attempted to derail his bid for a place on the School Board. LISD Superintendent Jack Patton was informed by Mr. Mraz of his intention to run for office just days prior to two sexual harassment allegations conveniently lodged by LISD students against the candidate's son, Beau Mraz.

A "disciplinary hearing" was held March 23, 2001. The "hearing" was tape-recorded by Mr. Mraz and was attended by the candidate, his son, Tim Glover, and Earl Jarrett. This writer has listened to the tape. Indeed it raises serious questions of due process and fairness to the accused.

Monday, March 26, 2001, Mr. Mraz returned to the Superintendent's office and talked to Mr. Patton personally. According to Mr. Mraz, the first words out of the mouth of the Superintendent to the candidate were approximately: "Oh, by the way. The disciplinary hearing had nothing to do with your running for office."

Fascinating, isn't it? Convenient, as well. This publication has begun an investigation into whether or not the "disciplinary hearing" was in fact designed to derail Mr. Mraz's bid for a place on the School Board. There will be much more to come...

Being a forum for the exchange of ideas and in fairness to all, equal space is offered by this publication to all candidates for the School Board.

Changing the subject and on a totally different issue, the vicious assault on the Fourth Amendment continues unabated. On April 2, 2001 a fascist U.S. Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision further eviscerated the right to counsel during police questioning of a suspect. -- Should the accused already have an attorney in one investigation, he or she is not entitled to have the lawyer present during questioning of a related crime. Sadly, the Founders must be turning in their graves.

Furthering the apparent goal of a fascist police state, the Court has outrageously given corrupt and abusive police officers the green light to do an end-run around the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. ... Adolph and Benito must indeed be laughing their asses off from their fiery perches.

Not surprisingly, the three most extreme members of the Court, -- Rehnquist, Scalia, and Thomas, were joined by O'Connor and Kennedy. Interestingly, the ruling involved a Texas case where the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had earlier ordered a confession to be thrown out. Bottom line? Open war has been declared on the Fourth Amendment by an outrageously biased fascist Supreme Court.

In deference to "detained" American naval personnel in China, pointed commentary regarding Bush "Administration" handling of the incident will be delayed.

Think the Bush budget and tax cut will line your pockets? Think again. The $1.2 trillion "cut" in taxes passed by the Senate does not fully kick in until years down the road. ... If ever. More importantly, who can accurately predict the economy 5-7 years from now? Most pointedly, think legislators will hold the line on spending? Think again. After all, there is little substantive difference between both major political parties. Why aren't legislators more concerned with paying down the national debt?

Of equal immediate urgency, think the financial situation of Llano Memorial Hospital will improve soon? ... Or that "President" George "The Tush" Bush cares? The Bush "Administration" budget slashes health programs for the uninsured. Readers are reminded indigent health care reimbursement, -- as well as egregious looting by Hospital employees, have indeed contributed heavily to current financial difficulties experienced by LMHS. Fascinating, isn't it?

Inexplicably, the media continues to cover N.Y. Sen. Hillary Clinton in considerable detail. Apparently, the freshman Senator has ruled out running for the Presidency. Supposedly, forever. Who cares? ... Most pointedly, believe it when you see it, no? All joking aside, however, the press has done little to investigate a serious incident in the current First Lady's past.

Laura Welch Bush, 17 at the time, ran a stop sign in a fatal crash in Midland, Nov. 6, 1963, killing 17-year-old Michael Douglas.

Reportedly, accident records indicated Mrs. Bush had committed two violations contributing to the accident. One box checked by police apparently read "disregard stop sign or light". The other checked box was illegible. Inexplicably, no charges were filed in the case.

While the fatal incident is indeed ancient history, -- occurring some 38 years ago, think the Douglas family feels the same? Running a stop sign today, leading to a fatality, usually results in serious charges being filed. Including, manslaughter. Yet, the First Lady escaped prosecution. ... Didn't even receive a ticket for running the stop sign.

While Mrs. Bush indeed "remains unable to talk about it" to this day, think it's due more to political considerations than true remorse? Good question. ... And most pointedly, why the hell shouldn't the question be asked? After all, why aren't Republicans exposed to the same scrutiny Democrats were over the last eight years? -- This coming from a political independent who did NOT vote for Clinton, Bush, or Gore?

Friends, serious consideration is given by this writer to simply walking away from The Ledger due to a glaring lack of financial support from the readership. As strongly asserted in Special Edition V65, lacking any vested interest and no longer owning property in Llano County, why continue in the absence of financial support from a cowardly and selfish community? -- Despite a combined Llano Ledger and Llano Ledger 2 visitor count exceeding 91,700? ... Two years, now. For what?

Tim Chorney, Publisher
The Llano Ledger



Tim Chorney, Publisher
P.O. Box 997
Buchanan Dam Tx. 78609

llanoledger@mailcity.com

Page Updated Wed Jun 13, 2001 5:52pm EDT