Newsletter Text V351
©2014 All Rights Reserved
March 10, 2014
Got
guts? Tired of being lied to? Like an alternative source of information
truly independent and free of government propaganda? Want this publication
to continue? Send a donation to P.O. Box 151, Buchanan Dam, Tx. 78609.
Publisher's Note: This publication receives
no financial support through advertising. Although shaken down, looted,
and abused by corrupt government, area businesses remain unwilling to stand
up. Locals are too gutless to donate financially, cowardly fearing
retribution. For this publication to survive, national readers need
to contribute. Liberty In Peril is, has been, and will always remain
beholden to NO ONE. -- Precisely why there is no financial assistance.
... From day of launch and certainly a no-brainer to this very day, firmly
resolved to walk away first rather than compromise principle. -- To the
chagrin of many and delight of few. T.C. (5-7-13).
For new readers: Fascism,
nazism, national socialism defined as the pernicious blend of government,
business, and religion. 'Justified' by perversion and bastardization of
the latter.
Newsletter Text V351
Before reading the new edition kindly take time to consider the following:
The following Liberty In Peril links, although unhighlighted, are all currently active. ... At this time. It is important, however to bookmark each. Why? Remember the nature of this publication, -- as well as the fact all sites are hosted free of charge on independent servers. This means they can be removed at any time due to changes in terms of service or hacking attack. Since this publication is unfunded, it is the goal to keep at least one up and running at all times. Bookmark! -- If one is lost, you'll have access to another. Should a site or sites not been updated, it may only mean this writer has temporarily lost Internet access. Patience. ... Pesky issues all associated with an unfunded publication that aggressively challenges the status quo.
libertyinperil@yahoo.com
www.libertyinperil.host-ed.me
www.libertyinperil.x10.mx
www.libertyinperil.twomini.com
www.libertyinperil.wink.ws
www.libertyinperil.t15.org
www.libertyinperil.freewebhostings.ru
Please take time to bookmark the above URLs. The recent posting above had a mistaken URL for host-ed.me. It has been corrected. It is now the same as the one posted on the homepage. This publication is self-funded. Again, sites are hosted free of charge. That does mean they can be taken down at any time due to changes in terms of service, or hacking attack. Internet access for servicing and update may not always be available. -- Again, foibles of an unfunded publication. Should you bookmark, at least one site should always remain available. ... Until funding and better arrangements can be made. 10-6-13
*****************************************************************************************
Wells Fargo Deceptive Trade Practices-Salvo 2
This is the second installment of an ongoing expose of egregious Wells Fargo deceptive trade practices. Will take some time to fully upload all correspondence and documentation, as well as subsequent analysis. This week, the first two hard copy complaints filed with the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Texas Attorney General Consumer Protection Division have been posted. There is far more to come. Far more. Patience.
Richard Cordray, Director
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
P.O. Box 4503
Iowa City, Iowa 52244
September 20, 2013
Re: Egregious Deceptive Trade Practices-Wells Fargo
Dear Mr. Cordray:
On January 18, 2013, this writer attempted to open a checking account with Wells Fargo, MAC T7025-010, Kingsland, Texas. While this account as well as a savings account additionally required by bank policy were opened, it was clearly done under false pretenses by Amanda Wright, Personal Banker, NMLSR ID: 936717. Under supervision of Lynn Massey, Store Manager, NMLSR ID: 555274.
Before providing complete details, this complaint was delayed due to severe out of state family problems initially requiring re-opening of a checking account with Wells Fargo, personal health issues, and relaunch of an investigative publication that was immediately hacked upon relaunch months ago.
On January 18, this writer approached Ms Wright with a substantial United States Treasury Check and the need to re-open a checking account. – Closed several years earlier when the bank greedily changed policy and attempted to charge an enormous monthly service charge on a free checking account that had been open since 1999. … Charge customers for using their money.
Ms. Wright insisted, to obtain free checking, substantial deposits would have to remain in not only a checking account, but a savings account as well. In addition, this writer would be required to participate in online banking. – Bank policy, she falsely claimed. The following is a detailed listing of the deceptive trade practices perpetrated by Wells Fargo:
1)The Consumer Account Application she showed me on a computer monitor, and had this writer electronically sign, was not the same as the written hard-copy subsequently provided. Realized that on the way home and immediately returned to the bank. The electronic display did not include the following bank policy: “You are authorized to make any inquiries that you consider appropriate to determine if you should open or maintain the account. This may include ordering a credit report or other report (i.e. information from any motor vehicle department or other state agency) on me.”
In bold font, it continues: “I have received a copy of the applicable account agreement, the privacy policy, and the Direct Deposit Advance Service Agreement and Product Guide* (as each may be amended from time to time) and agree to be bound by their terms. I also agree to the terms of the dispute resolution program described in the foregoing agreements. Under the dispute resolution program, our disputes will be decided before one or more neutral persons in an arbitration proceeding and not by a jury trial or a trial before a judge.”
Had I been informed of these policies, would never had electronically signed the agreement. Never would have agreed to a credit check to open a checking or savings account. What for? Had no intention of borrowing money, just depositing a rather sizable amount. Never bounced a check. Never gave Wells Fargo any problems, – until now with this complaint. Never would have willingly forfeited the constitutional right to go to court to resolve a dispute and foolishly agree to binding arbitration.
… Which is nearly always controlled, manipulated by these exceptionally poorly-regulated corporations that usually do precisely as they please. When confronted, Ms. Wright falsely feigned ignorance. Had a 'deer in the headlights' facial expression. Had no explanation.
Demanded to talk to the Store Manager. Ms. Massey informed me the bank was the government, they could do as they please. Quickly informed her the bank was not the government, only FDIC insured. Remains an accurate measure of the Aryan arrogance of Wells Fargo corporate management, however. Quickly informed her I would sue should my privacy be abrogated by a credit or records check.
She offered to cancel both accounts. Refused. Had already disclosed personal information this writer could not recover from this outrageously corrupt and abusive corporation. Information it would share with anyone it pleased with impunity, Information it could and would not protect. Leading to the next example of egregious deceptive trade practices:
2)When Ms. Wright opened the new accounts, she was immediately able to access all personal information on the old checking account that had been opened in 1999 and closed several years ago as earlier stated. I pointedly asked her what my personal information was still doing on a Wells Fargo computer network accessible all over the country, as well as the rest of the world. Anyone could have obtained that information or hacked the system. She had no response. Neither did the Store Manager.
The account had long since been closed. That information belongs to me, not the bank. I never signed any agreement with Wells Fargo forfeiting my right to my own personal information. Yet, there it was. Worse, it included false information that I had never given the bank. Refused to give Wells Fargo when the account was originally opened in 1999. For damned good reason. Was none of their business, or the government's.
Clearly, the deceptive officer who opened the account years ago made up false information. Outrageously, filled in the blanks after I left the bank. Ms. Wright desperately tried to elicit correct information that I quickly refused to give her. As a law-abiding citizen, it's none of the bank's business, none of the government's business. “Know Your Customer” policy is an outrageous invasion of personal privacy of innocent citizens, falsely in the name of “national 'security.'” Rather it is implementation of a fascist police-state this writer will never accept, never cooperate with. The hell with the treasonous, traitorous USA 'Patriot' Act.
Having received a written bogus policy follow-up from Wells Fargo Legal from Ms. Massey, she again offered to close the accounts. I refused and informed her complaints would be filed against the bank with state and federal authorities.
She subsequently changed the requirements for maintaining a 'free' checking and savings account. Interesting, isn't it? Lowered the minimums required. Did away with the online banking requirement. – The online agreement forced on account holders is worse than the written one. More repressive. More invasive. She wanted me to re-electronically sign the agreement. Refused, since it would have abrogated my right to sue if my privacy is, or was, invaded or Wells Fargo engages in any further deceptive trade practices.
Without question, Ms. Wright is a brilliant, young, gifted woman. Who likely knowingly capitulated to pressure brought to bear by her corporate masters to engage in self-serving, lucrative deceptive trade practices. As low woman on the totem pole, she possibly believed she had no choice. Conversely, as a seasoned banking veteran, Ms. Massey has no excuse.
Until rampant deceptive trade practices are effectively addressed by authorities, there will be no faith or trust in the hopelessly greedy, abusive, corrupt, arrogant banking community. Precisely why an increasing number eschew business with them, – unless forced by personal circumstances.
Should an ordinary Joe or Jane engage in such deceptive practices as the banking industry, they are rightfully quickly indicted for fraud or worse. Not so, the banking community. Rather, it's protected and coddled by authorities. Too big to fail. This has to change.
For your information, every other bank canvassed in this area is as bad or worse than Wells Fargo regarding policy. None are effectively regulated. None. Not one of them. All do as they please. With virtual impunity. Convenient isn't it? Are all in bed with their 'regulators?' Certainly, seems so. Whose money, personal information do they truly think it belongs to? Them? Arrogance, hubris? Unlimited, endless. National socialist.
Coup de grace? A most poignant example of abject corporate cluelessness? By a corporate management suite that clearly doesn't 'get it?' The following outrageously galling phony propaganda printed on the monthly statement: “Thank you for being a loyal Wells Fargo customer. We value your trust in our company and look forward to continuing to serve you with your financial needs.” Is that right?
Who the hell are they kidding? They're delusional. They betray their customers, callously invade privacy, falsely believe they own account holder personal information, share private information with whomever they choose as long as their pockets are lined, pay pennies in interest for thousands deposited, release financial information to government goons without a warrant.
How? Courtesy of National Security Letters that are outrageously unconstitutional despite rulings to the contrary by the fascists legislating their perverse ideological views from the bench in support of their corporate masters. Insult to injury? These very same bankers and others are forced by the very same dictators in government not to disclose to account holders that they've been betrayed not only by our outrageously corrupt and abusive government, but the corporate management suite that cowardly complies. Yet, this very same corporate management suite gallingly and falsely believes they're 'serving' account holders. How? By betraying the best interests of their customers? They serve only themselves, 'Regulators' aid and abet. A fascist police-state.
While customer service truly stinks, remains non-existent at Wells Fargo, it's as bad or worse elsewhere. Precisely, why the banking cartel does as it pleases. Why? Because it can. If an account weren't needed for legal reasons currently, this bank would be promptly dumped.
Why is it a United States Treasury Check cannot be cashed at any FDIC-insured bank with identification without a substantial charge, -- or at all? That is, some of these federally-insured banks will not cash these checks. Why? One wanted to loot this writer approximately $300 for the 'privilege' of cashing a check from the government insuring it. Hubris. Unbridled greed. Aryan arrogance.
Upon resolution of these issues by state and federal authorities, kindly be advised Liberty In Peril will post an expose' on the banking industry and the government's egregious failure to date to properly regulate it. Worse? Failure to correct the abuses, corruption, deception, and outright fraud repeatedly committed by these banks. This letter and all correspondence from you and your agency will be ultimately posted in my publication. Redacted as necessary.
Sincerely,
Tim Chorney, Publisher
Liberty In Peril
Formerly,
The Llano Ledger
www.libertyinperil.x10.mx
www.libertyinperil.twomini.com
www.libertyinperil.wink.ws
www.libertyinperil.t15.org
www.libertyinperil.freewebhostings.ru
P.O. Box 151
Buchanan Dam, Texas 78609
c: Liberty In Peril
Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General
Consumer Protection Division
PO Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
September 20, 2013
Re: Egregious Deceptive Trade Practices-Wells Fargo
Dear Mr. Abbott:
On January 18, 2013, this writer attempted to open a checking account with Wells Fargo, MAC T7025-010, Kingsland, Texas. While this account as well as a savings account additionally required by bank policy were opened, it was clearly done under false pretenses by Amanda Wright, Personal Banker, NMLSR ID: 936717. Under supervision of Lynn Massey, Store Manager, NMLSR ID: 555274.
Before providing complete details, this complaint was delayed due to severe out of state family problems initially requiring re-opening of a checking account with Wells Fargo, personal health issues, and relaunch of an investigative publication that was immediately hacked upon relaunch months ago.
On January 18, this writer approached Ms Wright with a substantial United States Treasury Check and the need to re-open a checking account. – Closed several years earlier when the bank greedily changed policy and attempted to charge an enormous monthly service charge on a free checking account that had been open since 1999. … Charge customers for using their money.
Ms. Wright insisted, to obtain free checking, substantial deposits would have to remain in not only a checking account, but a savings account as well. In addition, this writer would be required to participate in online banking. – Bank policy, she falsely claimed. The following is a detailed listing of the deceptive trade practices perpetrated by Wells Fargo:
1)The Consumer Account Application she showed me on a computer monitor, and had this writer electronically sign, was not the same as the written hard-copy subsequently provided. Realized that on the way home and immediately returned to the bank. The electronic display did not include the following bank policy: “You are authorized to make any inquiries that you consider appropriate to determine if you should open or maintain the account. This may include ordering a credit report or other report (i.e. information from any motor vehicle department or other state agency) on me.”
In bold font, it continues: “I have received a copy of the applicable account agreement, the privacy policy, and the Direct Deposit Advance Service Agreement and Product Guide* (as each may be amended from time to time) and agree to be bound by their terms. I also agree to the terms of the dispute resolution program described in the foregoing agreements. Under the dispute resolution program, our disputes will be decided before one or more neutral persons in an arbitration proceeding and not by a jury trial or a trial before a judge.”
Had I been informed of these policies, would never had electronically signed the agreement. Never would have agreed to a credit check to open a checking or savings account. What for? Had no intention of borrowing money, just depositing a rather sizable amount. Never bounced a check. Never gave Wells Fargo any problems, – until now with this complaint. Never would have willingly forfeited the constitutional right to go to court to resolve a dispute and foolishly agree to binding arbitration. … Which is nearly always controlled, manipulated by these exceptionally poorly-regulated corporations that usually do precisely as they please. When confronted, Ms. Wright falsely feigned ignorance. Had a 'deer in the headlights' facial expression. Had no explanation.
Demanded to talk to the Store Manager. Ms. Massey informed me the bank was the government, they could do as they please. Quickly informed her the bank was not the government, only FDIC insured. Remains an accurate measure of the Aryan arrogance of Wells Fargo corporate management, however. Quickly informed her I would sue should my privacy be abrogated by a credit or records check.
She offered to cancel both accounts. Refused. Had already disclosed personal information this writer could not recover from this outrageously corrupt and abusive corporation. Information it would share with anyone it pleased with impunity, Information it could and would not protect. Leading to the next example of egregious deceptive trade practices:
2)When Ms. Wright opened the new accounts, she was immediately able to access all personal information on the old checking account that had been opened in 1999 and closed several years ago as earlier stated. I pointedly asked her what my personal information was still doing on a Wells Fargo computer network accessible all over the country, as well as the rest of the world. Anyone could have obtained that information or hacked the system. She had no response. Neither did the Store Manager.
The account had long since been closed. That information belongs to me, not the bank. I never signed any agreement with Wells Fargo forfeiting my right to my own personal information. Yet, there it was. Worse, it included false information that I had never given the bank. Refused to give Wells Fargo when the account was originally opened in 1999. For damned good reason. Was none of their business, or the government's.
Clearly, the deceptive officer who opened the account years ago made up false information. Outrageously, filled in the blanks after I left the bank. Ms. Wright desperately tried to elicit correct information that I quickly refused to give her. As a law-abiding citizen, it's none of the bank's business, none of the government's business. “Know Your Customer” policy is an outrageous invasion of personal privacy of innocent citizens, falsely in the name of “national 'security.'” Rather it is implementation of a fascist police-state this writer will never accept, never cooperate with. The hell with the treasonous, traitorous USA 'Patriot' Act.
Having received a written bogus policy follow-up from Wells Fargo Legal from Ms. Massey, she again offered to close the accounts. I refused and informed her complaints would be filed against the bank with state and federal authorities.
She subsequently changed the requirements for maintaining a 'free' checking and savings account. Interesting, isn't it? Lowered the minimums required. Did away with the online banking requirement. – The online agreement forced on account holders is worse than the written one. More repressive. More invasive. She wanted me to re-electronically sign the agreement. Refused, since it would have abrogated my right to sue if my privacy is, or was, invaded or Wells Fargo engages in any further deceptive trade practices.
Without question, Ms. Wright is a brilliant, young, gifted woman. Who likely knowingly capitulated to pressure brought to bear by her corporate masters to engage in self-serving, lucrative deceptive trade practices. As low woman on the totem pole, she possibly believed she had no choice. Conversely, as a seasoned banking veteran, Ms. Massey has no excuse.
Until rampant deceptive trade practices are effectively addressed by authorities, there will be no faith or trust in the hopelessly greedy, abusive, corrupt, arrogant banking community. Precisely why an increasing number eschew business with them, – unless forced by personal circumstances.
Should an ordinary Joe or Jane engage in such deceptive practices as the banking industry, they are rightfully quickly indicted for fraud or worse. Not so, the banking community. Rather, it's protected and coddled by authorities. Too big to fail. This has to change.
For your information, every other bank canvassed in this area is as bad or worse than Wells Fargo regarding policy. None are effectively regulated. None. Not one of them. All do as they please. With virtual impunity. Convenient isn't it? Are all in bed with their 'regulators?' Certainly, seems so. Whose money, personal information do they truly think it belongs to? Them? Arrogance, hubris? Unlimited, endless. National socialist.
Coup de grace? A most poignant example of abject corporate cluelessness? By a corporate management suite that clearly doesn't 'get it?' The following outrageously galling phony propaganda printed on the monthly statement: “Thank you for being a loyal Wells Fargo customer. We value your trust in our company and look forward to continuing to serve you with your financial needs.” Is that right?
Who the hell are they kidding? They're delusional. They betray their customers, callously invade privacy, falsely believe they own account holder personal information, share private information with whomever they choose as long as their pockets are lined, pay pennies in interest for thousands deposited, release financial information to government goons without a warrant.
How? Courtesy of National Security Letters that are outrageously unconstitutional despite rulings to the contrary by the fascists legislating their perverse ideological views from the bench in support of their corporate masters. Insult to injury? These very same bankers and others are forced by the very same dictators in government not to disclose to account holders that they've been betrayed not only by our outrageously corrupt and abusive government, but the corporate management suite that cowardly complies. Yet, this very same corporate management suite gallingly and falsely believes they're 'serving' account holders. How? By betraying the best interests of their customers? They serve only themselves, 'Regulators' aid and abet. A fascist police-state.
While customer service truly stinks, remains non-existent at Wells Fargo, it's as bad or worse elsewhere. Precisely, why the banking cartel does as it pleases. Why? Because it can. If an account weren't needed for legal reasons currently, this bank would be promptly dumped.
Why is it a United States Treasury Check cannot be cashed at any FDIC-insured bank with identification without a substantial charge, -- or at all? That is, some of these federally-insured banks will not cash these checks. Why? One wanted to loot this writer approximately $300 for the 'privilege' of cashing a check from the government insuring it. Hubris. Unbridled greed. Aryan arrogance.
Upon resolution of these issues by state and federal authorities, kindly be advised Liberty In Peril will post an expose' on the banking industry and the government's egregious failure to date to properly regulate it. Worse? Failure to correct the abuses, corruption, deception, and outright fraud repeatedly committed by these banks. This letter and all correspondence from you and your agency will be ultimately posted in my publication. Redacted as necessary.
Sincerely,
Tim Chorney, Publisher
Liberty In Peril
Formerly,
The Llano Ledger
www.libertyinperil.x10.mx
www.libertyinperil.twomini.com
www.libertyinperil.wink.ws
www.libertyinperil.t15.org
www.libertyinperil.freewebhostings.ru
P.O. Box 151
Buchanan Dam, Texas 78609
c: Liberty In Peril
The March 3rd primary is proof positive of one of two possibilities. The fix was in, or, the electorate remains hopelessly ignorant, aggressively stupid. How can voters foolishly ignore the fact Rebecca Lange came from a District Attorney's Office too corrupt to investigate and prosecute a County Judge who recently unlawfully and unconstitutionally attempted to force a quota on all four Constables and the Sheriff's Office? How is it, her husband, Steve Lange, an unknown, appears out of nowhere yet comes in second in a five-way race for JP2? Especially in view of the fact other candidates were far better qualified. Should he beat Ballard in a pending runoff, the conflict of interest with his wife as presumptive County Attorney would be egregious. Clearly, to the advantage of the fascist bastards who falsely believe they run and own this hellhole County. Think they had no hand in it? Certainly, intend to take a very close look. Have information? Your identity will be protected.
Without question, enhances County deathgrip
on power. Most disturbing? Ballard received as many votes as
she did. Certainly, a testament to the lack of judgment, aggressive
stupidity, abject ignorance of the body politic. Or, a thoroughly
corrupt election process that cannot be trusted. In Nazi Llano
County. Should the trend continue, we'll endure another four
years of this outrageously corrupt, abusive, inept sad excuse for a 'jurist.'
While this writer has not seen defeated incumbent Judge Dan Mills in action,
have received numerous complaints from attorneys. Mudslinging in
the race, superbly entertaining. Change, no question, in the air.
Think Stubbs any better? Hope so. Time will tell. Far
more to come.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine, although bloodless to date, bears close resemblance to an earlier era. Seems Putin remains a relic from the Cold War past. After all, was a former KGB officer in the Soviet regime. Hasn't lost predilection for despotism, abuse of power. Disdain for democratic principles and rule of law both in stark evidence. Distortion of reality and denial of presence of Russian forces in patchless Russian military attire driving vehicles sporting Russian plates are proof positive Putin is either a liar, -- or, insane.
Far more troubling is world reaction. Reminiscent of another era when a Neville Chamberlain was more than willing to cowardly appease a Nazi dictator. With disastrous consequences. The Brits state they will not go to war, but believe in imposing sanctions against the Russians. France hasn't said much of anything. Germany doesn't want sanctions since sanctions would cost the German economy dearly. Clearly, so rationalizes most of the European community. Conveniently forget history. The United States, through Secretary of State John Kerry, talks in circles. -- The President just likes to hear himself talk.
Worse? The U.S. is in no position to lecture anyone. Reagan The-Not-So-Great invaded Grenada for political purposes. Bush The First stormed Panama, kidnapped Noriega, hauled him to the United States for prosecution of drug trafficking the former President and CIA operatives were reportedly themselves engaged in. When Bush was CIA Director. His war criminal son, George "The Tush" Bush, blitzkrieged Iraq under false pretenses, is responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 Iraqis, thousands of American troops killed, tens of thousands maimed, engaged in torture, egregiously ignored the Geneva Conventions, etc.. The list could go on and on. All this leaves our government in an extremely poor position to credibly offer criticism of anyone, including the current Russian dictator.
Obama knew quite some time a Russian invasion of Ukraine was a distinct possibility. Did absolutely nothing. Not even the slightest, most mediocre, tamest show of force. Not even movement of the Mediterranean fleet in response. Nothing. Even now, where are calls for immediate suspension of Russia from the UN, including its permanent seat on the Security Council? All other groups including G-8, G-20, and every other organization Russia either belongs to or is affiliated with? All trade should be cut off. Immediately. No matter the cost to the world community. The President on 3-6-14 through Executive Order placed some sanctions on the perpetrators. If Putin isn't confronted now, where does he go next? The rest of Ukraine? The Balkans? Poland? Should any bloodshed occur, the Ukrainians shouldn't be left swinging in the wind. This is a world problem. Long-term consequences, likely disastrous. Yet, we hear little more than empty rhetoric from Obama, his henchmen, the UN, as well as the rest of the world community. Interesting, isn't it?
... As of Sunday, 3-9-14, Russian troops continue to pour into and occupy Ukraine. Reportedly, Russia has launched cyber attacks to further criple the Ukrainian economy. Yet, little more than talk from the world community in response.
Tim Chorney
Expose: Wells Fargo Deceptive
Trade Practices
Wells Fargo Opening Salvo 3-3-14
Wells Fargo Lynn Massey 3-2-14
Wells Fargo Deceptive Trade Practices
Salvo 2, 3-10-14
JP2 Candidate Shelly Comerford 2-9-14
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 2-3-14
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 9-8-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 7-10-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 6-4-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 5-21-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 5-9-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 4-26-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 3-18-13
Sheriff Bill Blackburn 11-27-12
EMAIL TO HACKER 7-10-13
EMAIL TO HACKER 6-11-13
EMAIL TO HACKER 5-14-13
Tim Chorney, Publisher
Liberty In Peril
...
Formerly
The Llano Ledger
Previous Newsletter
Next Newsletter
Back To Home Page
Tim Chorney, Publisher
P.O. Box 151
Buchanan Dam, Tx. 78609