The Llano Ledger


Newsletter Text V3

This Website Is Full. Starting With The December 25, 2000 Newsletter, All Future Editions Will Be Posted In The Llano Ledger 2, Found By Clicking http://maxpages.com/llanoledger2.

************************May 24, l999************************

The Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET) is once again in the news. Apparently, there is an $11,000 shortfall for the fiscal year ending May 31. It is supposedly due to a cash-match program required under the grants. Reportedly, the total figure needed is $55,000. NET is desperately trying to make up an $11,000 deficit, hat in hand.

Our illustrious Commissioners' Court approved a $1500 "donation" to NET Commander Brent Nichols and his organization. Why? These corrupt, arrogant, and abusive officers are predators on our highways, terrorizing and harassing innocent citizens. Sadly, it is time to take a careful look at the effectiveness of the Narcotics Enforcement Team, -- and the price to fleeting civil liberties.

Nichols asserts there will have been between 450 to 500 drug-related arrests by the end of the fiscal year. Why did he neglect to mention the fact most of those arrested are petty users? Isn't that precisely why the asset forfeiture figure is insufficient to cover NET operating expenses? Isn't that also why the Commander is making the rounds, hat in hand?

Most of those arrested are quickly released, usually overnight. Otherwise, the jail couldn't handle the overflow. Of course, NET does all it can to keep the jail population figure at or minimally above the maximum allowed. After all, there is a "reality" as well as an "agenda" at work here. How else can Sheriff Garrett and the "Boys" get a new jail and law enforcement center?

Since our illustrious commissioners have refused to order an independent study of the efficiency and operation of the county judicial and jail systems, how can we accurately assess the supposed "need"? Worse yet, our corrupt magistrates are routinely violating Eighth Amendment proscriptions against excessive bail. They also continue to drag their feet and delay the judicial process. After all, the judges do have to take care of our illustrious sheriff and his cronies. ... One hand does indeed wash the other, doesn't it? -- And sadly at taxpayer expense.

Nichols further asserts we're getting results from all the taxpayer expenditures. Is that right, Commander? What results? For the 450 to 500 arrests, how many were repeat offenders? How many others didn't you catch? For every individual arrested, there may have been 10, 50, or 100 who were not. No one knows for sure, but drug demand is clearly enormous and growing.

Despite the evisceration of the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution over the last 30 years, drugs are as cheap and plentiful as ever. The "drug war" has been an abject failure only resulting in the decimation of constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties. I say this as a citizen who does not use drugs, and strongly opposes their use.

By your own admission, Commander, NET is having problems nailing the suppliers and kingpins. This is true despite the employment of Gestapo-like tactics by your corrupt and abusive officers. The only thing you have clearly accomplished is the further alienation of the law-abiding citizens you allegedly serve. Your assertion NET has succeeded in getting drugs off the streets is outrageously false and ludicrous. If indeed true, why isn't the arrest figure dropping?

Commander, you further disingenuously assert NET isn't trying to grab money, and that doing so would give your corrupt and abusive organization a bad name. Not to worry, sir. The damage has already been done, -- and is stupidly self-inflicted. The only reason why your asset forfeiture figure isn't any higher is because this area is clearly not a distribution hub.

With a monthly budget supposedly in the $40,000 range, just what has NET really accomplished, other than further erosion of civil liberties and the alienation of the law-abiding public? While NET goals are noble, the end doesn't justify the means. The tactics employed are fascist and unconstitutional.

Worse yet, drug use continues to grow despite the best effort of our corrupt and abusive officers. It is most important to remember all local law enforcement operates at the pleasure and under the jurisdiction of District Attorney Sam Oatman. Mr. Oatman is ultimately responsible for the poisonous atmosphere and abuses of his minions.

Most pointedly, it is time to look for a new approach to this most difficult problem and scourge. Sadly, NET has become part of the problem, not the solution. Our illustrious and arrogant Commander and his abusive colleagues apparently continue to believe we live in Nazi Germany, not the United States.

Tim Chorney, Publisher (Scroll down for earlier edition.)

************************May 17, 1999************************

The Llano County Commissioners' Court stood firm on the supposed need for a new law enforcement center at a meeting held Monday evening May 10. Why? On what basis? Why didn't they have the courage and foresight to order a study of the efficiency and operation of our court and jail systems? The preordained "feasibility" study that had been previously ordered is a sham. It is no more than a rubber stamp for our illustrious "leaders".

It will be most interesting to follow the money trail and see how they each benefit from this latest boondoggle. How is it to be funded? Incredibly, our "leaders" have made no provision. Nonetheless, the taxpayers will be royally shafted to the tune of some $3 million.

Will overburdened and beleaguered taxpayers be asked to vote for another bond issue? Who knows? Our illustrious "leaders" have only decided to build the pork pen, not how to finance it. ... What do I want, the world or what? After all, this is Llano County, no? The irresponsibility and arrogance of our officials are stunning and sickening to behold. With little to no public input or interest, the taxpayers will get exactly what they so richly deserve, won't they? -- It's time to bend over and grab your ankles. The School Board and Commissioners are on their way with the shaft.

The new jail will have 48 beds. In light of the unconstitutional Gestapo-like tactics currently employed by NET, our state troopers, and Garrett's "Boys", will a 48 bed facility indeed be enough? After all, we do have an increasing number of petty criminals being held in lieu of bail set at unconstitutional and outrageously high levels by our judges.

Worse yet, our illustrious magistrates have been apparently doing their very best to drag their feet and delay the judicial process even further. -- After all, one hand does wash the other, no? It will be most interesting to follow the kickbacks to their source. ... No matter how cleverly concealed, they are traceable through information provided by disgruntled colleagues, acquaintances, friends, and even disaffected family members. I urge you to come forward. Your identity will be protected.

As in other areas across the nation, the political Right in Llano County has stood up and strongly spoken out publicly against the fiscal waste and corruption at the federal level. Yet locally, they remain strangely silent and apparently oblivious to our own corrupt and abusive officials and police officers. Why? Is it a lack of guts?

After all, it is easy and politically correct to verbally eviscerate the President and other corrupt and abusive officials and officers at the federal level. Interestingly and more importantly, these officials are not able to easily respond or "strike back". It's easy to be "brave" under those circumstances, no? On the other hand, doing the same to our local officials requires some intestinal fortitude. After all, one might have to withstand harassment, further abuse, and retribution from these corrupt, cowardly, and arrogant officials.

The deafening public silence and lack of guts are stunning and appalling to witness. -- Especially in view of the fact this is supposed to be the United States, not Nazi Germany. Once again, we do get what we so richly deserve, don't we? The hypocrisy is stifling, but laughable. Sadly, the joke is on us, the people. Our corrupt and abusive "leaders" are certainly laughing. The Founders must be rolling over in their graves.

Tim Chorney, Publisher (Scroll down for earlier edition.)

************************May 11,1999*************************

Sadly, voter turnout for the May 1 School Board election was pitiful. Only 11% of the registered voters chose to exercise a strikingly precious right. Egregiously low turnout sends a destructive message to our officials. It clearly tells them we really don't care. More importantly, it gives them license to do as they please.

Earlier last week, the School Board met in a lengthy closed session. Why? After all, they are discussing the people's business, aren't they? Don't we have a right to directly know what is or isn't transpiring at these meetings, rather than hearing of it from a secondary source? Why did they go into executive session? What were they hiding, or "protecting" the citizens from learning? Was the closed session indeed lawful?

Apparently, the Board approved three new positions. Action on 15 others was postponed. The public needs to be aware these positions will ultimately cost the taxpayers some $500,000. -- What's another half million bucks anyway, no? After all, the taxpayers haven't been gouged and gored enough yet, have they? The Board also apparently voted unanimously to ax the local homestead tax exemption from 20 to 10%.

After all, how else can they afford to pay for the new positions as well as other cost overruns in the school finances? -- Another royal shafting of the taxpayers. Most importantly, the school bond and Board elections are over. The Board is finally free to do as they please and stick it to us. -- And stick it to us, they have. Sadly, they're only getting started.

Magnanimously, high school principal Dennis Hill has admitted "responsibility" for an $11,630.85 past debt that is apparently due to the Taylor Publishing Company. Guess who will pay? The principal? No. Not a chance. Why admit "responsibility", Mr. Hill, if you're not willing to personally make it right? Is this in fact the fine example you wish to set for your students?

District Attorney Sam Oatman and Sheriff Nathan Garrett are once again in the news. Both are again pressing for a new jail. Oatman is blaming recent jail breaks and attempted escapes on antiquated jail systems in the area. Is that right, Mr. Oatman? Why did you neglect to mention the fact that the Llano County Jail received an upgrade some 17 years ago, courtesy of the beleaguered taxpayers? Once again, convenient memory loss, Mr. Oatman? ...Oh, I almost forgot. How could I? After all, Garrett and the "Boys" can't be held responsible for everything, now can they?

More importantly, why haven't our illustrious district attorney, the sheriff, and the commissioners ordered an independent study of both the court and jail systems in our county? Instead of a worthless preordained "feasibility" study ordered by the commissioners, why aren't we investigating the efficiency and operation of the courts and the jail itself? Just as importantly, why aren't our local papers doing the same instead of regurgitating propaganda from our illustrious officials? ... What's another $3 million anyway, no? Sadly, gullible citizens willingly believe anything our corrupt and abusive officials, or the papers, tell them.

Most pointedly, Oatman and Garrett have no credibility. Both have been seriously damaged by the jail-rape scandal. While it was gratifying to learn Mr. Oatman recently attended an update course on Intoxication Manslaughter Investigation and Prosecution, when is he going to finally attend one on corruption in the jails, law enforcement, or in our prosecutors' offices? After all, there has been no independent outside criminal investigation of either the jail-rape scandal or the former victims' assistance coordinator employed by his office. Another convenient memory loss, Mr. Oatman?

Apparently, the district attorney is not concerned with the royal shafting of the taxpayers, or the corruption in law enforcement, the jails, or even his own office. He is concerned, however, with the solidification and consolidation of his own power and that of his cronies. After all, innocent citizens are still being harassed and terrorized by corrupt and abusive officers on our roads as well as at the Pub and elsewhere. Whether these officers are state troopers, NET members, or sheriff's department employees, they still operate under the jurisdiction of our illustrious district attorney. Sadly, the abuses continue to date and Mr. Oatman is directly responsible for them.

Just as importantly, we have some serious problems in the area of school finances that need investigation by Mr. Oatman. Apparently, waste and cost overruns are a serious problem within the school system. There is also a possible conflict of interest on the School Board itself. This publication will take a very careful look at these problems over the next several months. How can we trust Mr. Oatman to do the same?

After all and despite corruption in the Burnet Consolidated Independent School District (BCISD), Mr. Oatman's Burnet County grand jury returned no indictments. Why? -- One has to look very carefully at the district attorney. After all, DA's carefully "guide", manipulate, and control grand juries. Very rarely does a renegade jury act on its own. The DA is akin to a pied piper, capable of indicting virtually anyone regardless of culpability. Conviction, of course, is another matter.

In light of this, imagine Mr. Oatman's chagrin when the Llano County grand jury returned an indictment early last year against the jail trusty for the sexual assault of a female inmate. ... What to do to protect the sheriff and his cronies? Apparently, Mr. Oatman at the behest of the sheriff preemptively dismissed the indictment, ostensibly as part of a plea bargain. Mighty convenient and quick (within 48 hrs.), no?

After all, the sheriff wanted the trusty out of "his" (the taxpayers') jail as quickly as possible. Why? To protect himself and the "Boys"? -- Another glaring exquisite example of "kangaroo" justice. Egregiously complicating matters is the fact that neither the district attorney nor the sheriff ordered an independent outside criminal investigation. Who were they protecting and why?

Worse yet, Mr. Oatman is alleged to have tampered with a witness at the time of the grand jury investigation. Sadly, it's time for the people to finally wake up and demand an independent outside criminal investigation of our corrupt and abusive officials.

Tim Chorney, Publisher



Tim Chorney, Publisher
P.O. Box 997
Buchanan Dam Tx. 78609

llanoledger@mailcity.com

Page Updated Tue Oct 9, 2001 1:43pm EDT