The Llano Ledger
Newsletter Text V27
This Website Is Full. Starting With The December 25, 2000 Newsletter,
All Future Editions Will Be Posted In The Llano Ledger 2, Found By
Clicking http://maxpages.com/llanoledger2.
**************February 14, 2000***************
As promised earlier, this edition will cover the more serious charges
filed against prisoners incarcerated in the Llano County Jail from Jan.
1 to Nov. 10, 1999. Statistics for unidentified warrants and judgements
are also presented. Preliminary analysis and commentary will follow:
**********************************************
Figure 1. Table For Listed Charges. (Jan. 1 to Nov. 10, 1999)(Prisoner Incarceration Times Are Days Average Stay.)
Family Violence
19 Pris. 1.3 Days Av.
**********************
Simple Assault
2 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Assault
17 Pris. 11.6 Days Av.
**********************
Assault By Threat
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Assault By Physical Contact
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Attempted Aggravated Assault
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Aggravated Assault
6 Pris. 18 Days Av.
**********************
Aggravated Assault On Public Servant
2 Pris. 11 Days Av.
**********************
Assault With Bodily Injury
11 Pris. 4.2 Days Av.
**********************
Assault Class C
2 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Assault Class B
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Assault Class A
10 Pris. 2.7 Days Av.
**********************
Attempted Sexual Assault
1 Pris. 36 Days Av.
**********************
Aggravated Sexual Assault
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Attempted Murder
1 Pris. 3 Days Av.
**********************
Fraud
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Burglary
15 Pris. 12.2 Days Av.
**********************
Burglary Of Vehicle
2 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Theft B
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Theft A
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Theft
9 Pris. 17.1 Days Av.
**********************
Sale Of Stolen Property
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Hindering Secured Creditor
1 Pris. 63 Days Av.
**********************
Harboring A Runaway
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Furnishing Alcohol To Minor
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Child Abandonment
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Child Endangerment
1 Pris. 3 Days Av.
**********************
Injury To A Child
3 Pris. 52 Days Av.
**********************
Aggravated Sexual Assault Of Child
6 Pris. 27.2 Days Av.
**********************
Criminal Mischief
7 Pris. 9.1 Days Av.
**********************
Illegal Alien
5 Pris. 2.2 Days Av.
**********************
Sale Of Alcohol Without License
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Unlawful Carrying Of Weapon
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Failure To Stop & Render Aid
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Hunting At Night
1 Pris. 7 Days Av.
**********************
Retaliation
1 Pris. 46 Days Av.
**********************
Bond Forfeiture
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Hindering Apprehension
1 Pris. 17 Days Av.
**********************
Evading Arrest
5 Pris. 6.3 Days Av.
**********************
Resisting Arrest
1 Pris. 1 Day
**********************
Disorderly Conduct
20 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Voluntary Modification Of Probation
4 Pris. 7 Days Av.
**********************
Probation Violation
14 Pris. 29 Days Av.
**********************
Parole Violation
1 Pris. Stay Unknown
**********************
Impersonating Public Servant
1 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Interference With Public Duties Of Officer
3 Pris. 1 Day Av.
**********************
Possession of Marijuana
19 Pris. 2.7 Days Av.
**********************
Delivery Of Marijuana
16 Pris. 2.5 Days Av.
**********************
Possession Of Cocaine
5 Pris. 54 Days Av.
**********************
Possession Of Controlled Substance
16 Pris. 7.3 Days Av.
**********************
Delivery Of Controlled Substance
1 Pris. 9 Days
**********************
Delivery Of Methamphetamine
1 Pris. 3 Days Av.
**********************
Possession Of Drug Paraphernalia
1 Pris. 3 Days Av.
**********************
Drug Felony Judgement
1 Pris. 50 Days Av.
**********************
Unidentified Warrants
29 Pris. 9.3 Days Av.
**********************
Unidentified Bench Warrants
8 Pris. 29 Days Av.
**********************
Unidentified Judgements
20 Pris. 4.3 Days Av.
*******************************************
Since the booking records were incomplete and contained errors,
this is NOT a scientific study. It does, however, provide valuable
insight into local law enforcement and jurisprudence. As stated in an
earlier edition, no prisoner is counted twice. While prisoners are
often incarcerated on numerous charges, the most serious one was
selected and included in the compilation.
Due to the sheer volume of material, however, analysis and
commentary will take several additional Newsletter editions. A summary
compilation table will also be presented in the near future. Jail stats
will also be compared in a coming edition to NET statistics published
earlier. Sadly, there is a lot more to come. -- Much of it unflattering
to local officials.
For the balance of this edition, however, several salient features will
be briefly discussed. Notice the Evading Arrest statistics? Wonder what
the charge means? Good question. Four of the five prisoners arrested
were ONLY incarcerated on that particular charge with no additional
charges. What was the probable cause to arrest these prisoners? Again,
another excellent question. Talking to numerous former prisoners as
well as others in this county, many officers clearly have no
understanding of the Fourth Amendment and its requirements.
Notice the Bond Forfeiture stats? Sadly, they involve a woman in
her forties who was allegedly beaten with a nightstick by a Deputy
while her hands were cuffed behind her back. Having spent considerable
time investigating her allegations, I believe them to be true.
Since my involvement occurred shortly before her case was to
proceed to trial, however, there was insufficient time to locate a
former roommate eyewitness who had left the area. In addition, there
was a neighbor who also witnessed the beating, but apparently was too
afraid to step forward and do the right thing. Sad, isn't it?
Worse yet, the woman had a court-appointed attorney who did not act
in her best interests. Sadly, this is an all-too-familiar problem, --
especially here in Llano County. Who cares? Right? After all, prisoners
get what they deserve, don't they?
The woman's case was plea bargained. A less serious charge,
Disorderly Conduct, was conveniently dropped. Although Disorderly
Conduct usually involves fighting, it is a "catch all" charge extremely
useful to abusive officers and their corrupt handlers. Readers should
understand the woman had the nerve to peacefully verbally challenge JP
2 Lanny Stephenson regarding continuing harassment she was suffering at
the hands of local law enforcement. Our illustrious "Judge" laughed at
her.
"Her Royal Highness" was apparently seriously displeased, however,
and later dispatched the offending officer to the woman's house without
a warrant. The Deputy was unaccompanied by backup. Interesting, isn't
it? The bogus charge was Disorderly Conduct for having had the audacity
to verbally challenge the "Judge" earlier that day. ... The "Queen"
apparently has never read the First Amendment, -- or the rest of the
U.S. Constitution.
As usual, the woman's case involved numerous charges and was
finally "settled". The plea bargain results, of course, in a
considerable cash contribution to County coffers. The Jail and JP
offices are indeed the premier cash cows for the County. This is
precisely why the Sheriff and other County officials are passionately
and piously arguing for a new facility. ... The more beds, the more
money to be made by our corrupt and abusive officials.
Justice? What the hell is that? As our illustrious "leaders" might
say: "It's the MONEY, stupid." Sadly, taxpayers here are about to be
fleeced as surely as others were, and are, in Austin, -- shamelessly
looted by an egregious boondoggle called the Travis Criminal Justice
Center. Currently, the facility is at over twice proposed cost, -- and
rising. Think it won't happen here? Think again.
The Sheriff and I briefly discussed the beating incident the day I
toured the jail. While I refused to name the officer or the woman, Mr.
Garrett quickly informed me he knew exactly who I was talking about. He
wasted no time strongly asserting he wouldn't "tolerate" such behavior
from an officer. Really? In addition, he also stated he himself was
there at the time of the alleged incident, and that it didn't occur.
Interesting, isn't it?
If this woman suffers any further harassment, everything I've
gathered on the offending officer will be immediately published.
Equally pointedly, this Deputy has absolutely no regard or respect for
the Fourth Amendment and its probable cause requirements. In fact, he
routinely stops motorists at whim. Indeed because of this, he hauls in
more than his share on outstanding warrants. At what price? -- The
harassment of numerous truly innocent citizens he had no business
stopping? More pointedly, do we really want to live in a fascist police
state? Sadly, Nazi Germany was the most efficient power ever, -- and
certainly one of the most abusive. Do we want that here? Time to wake
up.
Although remarkably similar to Barney Fife, unlike Fife, this abusive
officer is a liability and a lawsuit waiting to happen. While prisoners
are seldom in a position to sue, this egregiously abusive officer will
eventually target an innocent citizen who will have the willingness,
determination, and, more importantly, the means to sue.
In the course of the last 10 months, I've had the opportunity to
meet several fine Deputies. An abusive officer is clearly a black eye
on others who are extremely professional in their conduct. Apparently,
the Sheriff does not have the guts to correct the problem. Why aren't
other honorable, professional officers demanding this issue be quickly
resolved in-house? Just as importantly, doesn't the oath you've sworn
demand it?
The Sheriff is clearly aware he has a problem with this officer.
Similarly, Mr. Garrett was, or should have been, equally aware of the
problems in the jail resulting in the rapes as well as other
inappropriate improper activities. Since the citizens indeed have the
right to know exactly what was tolerated in the jail, District Judge
Sam Sparks Summary Judgement ruling will be presented in its entirety
on this website. Excerpts from the Sheriff's deposition by Austin
attorney Iris Jones will also be published.
This will indeed be a very interesting year. Since the Sheriff and
District Attorney are running unopposed, many may wonder what is the
point? The point is principle, honor, and the precious right of the
people to know what's being done in their name. Just as importantly,
exposure of abuse to the light of day is the ONLY way to ensure it is
not repeated. Sadly, we're still living with the vestiges and legacy of
"Ligon's Law". Most pointedly, this has to change.
There is an interesting letter from the Attorney General's Office to
LISD Superintendent Jack Patton on Reader Letters Vol 2. Be sure to
check it out.
... Courage? What's that? In Llano County? What do I want, the
world or what? Sadly, WHERE indeed is the courage of the readers? The
visitor count stands at over 7300. If this publication is apparently
good enough to be read by so many regularly, WHY isn't it being
financially supported? -- Especially in a booming economy? Sadly, our
community is COWARDLY willing to allow this writer to take the risk, do
all the work, put up with the harassment, and swing in the wind. ...
'Ain't greed grand? ... 'Ain't' fear faux pas? -- Especially here in
Texas? Apparently not. For those who already provided assistance,
thanks. For the rest, shame on you. Where indeed is YOUR courage?
As repeatedly mentioned, the pop-up and banner advertising belongs
to Maxpages. _The Ledger receives no income from either, and remains
non-profit. As always, this publication needs and appreciates donations
from readers. Sadly, no other publication is willing to challenge
corrupt and abusive officials. Readers can expect continued aggressive,
relentless, officious, tireless pursuit of our most egregious
offenders. -- Figuratively speaking, a "take no prisoners" approach,
regardless of whose toes are stepped on, feathers ruffled, tail
feathers plucked, or beak tweaked. Things CAN change in our community.
Be part of it. Help me to help you. Support this publication.
Tim Chorney, Publisher
Tim Chorney, Publisher
P.O. Box 997
Buchanan Dam Tx. 78609
llanoledger@mailcity.com
Page Updated Tue Oct 9, 2001 1:26pm EDT