The Llano Ledger


Newsletter Text V120

BANNER AND POP-UP ADVERTISING PAYS ONLY FOR WEBSITE. THIS PUBLICATION RECEIVES NO COMPENSATION FROM MAXPAGES NOR THE ADVERTISERS. NONE.

*************Continuation Of October 15, 2001 Newsletter*************

Publisher's Note: Be sure to click on Newsletter Text V119 for the beginning of this edition. District Attorney Sam "The Sham" Oatman and the goons of the 33rd Judicial District Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET) have outrageously attacked liberty and free speech, necessitating a change of focus in this week's Newsletter. T.C.

O'Leary betrayed and turned in seven-year companion and partner Carolyn Alsobrook in an attempt to cover his own cowardly ass. Precisely why NET raided their Hermosa and Link St. homes on the day Alsobrook was evicted at a kangaroo court proceeding at JP3 Rudy Cunningham's office. Yet, this outrageous piece of human excrement and sad excuse for a man planted marijuana in an effort to betray a woman who had refused to participate in his illicit activities and ongoing drug usage. In plain English, this piece of shit turned on Alsobrook and others to cover his sorry ass.

Yet, this sick bastard continued to profess his "love" for Alsobrook repeatedly to this writer over the last two months. On Thursday, October 4, he left a folder and note to be forwarded to Alsobrook. Inexplicably at the time, the folder contained business receipts for Advanced Marine. Readers will recall Alsobrook already had the books and other records in her possession. Some of which had already been shared with this writer. The following is the UNEDITED note left for forwarding to Caryolyn:

"Tim
Give this
to Carolyn

A & M Marine
Reciepts 2000

Carolyn you Left this, I need my Micro Fish Back, your just a theFt and Drug head. Im sorry For you, you'll never come out of you sickness this time. Your Letting people use you, I never did! Your the Fool.

D."

On Saturday, October 6, he left a business card stuffed in the door crack asking me to contact him. On Sunday, October 7, he showed up and we had a chance to talk. None of that conversation, however, was conducted in confidence. I asked him why he had left the folder of material. He accused Carolyn of having personally broken into his place of business, stealing additional records from him. His reasoning was that since she had supposedly stolen everything else, he wanted her to have what she had left behind. He alleged she placed a "calling card" identifying her as the perpetrator, -- a straw left on a desk used to snort drugs. Sickeningly pathetic, isn't it?

Yet, he "loves" her, doesn't he? ... While informing everyone publicly who's willing to listen, that she's screwing every Tom, Dick, and Harry in town. This sad piece of shit apparently thinks everyone's as stupid as him. None of it is backed up by anyone other than a sick crony of his who has a reputation of beating the hell out of his own wife. Sadly, Carolyn witnessed and broke up one such episode herself. Payback, no?

Returning to the alleged theft of business records by Alsobrook, O'Leary stated the date and time of the alleged theft. It could NOT have happened as alleged by this lying son of a bitch. At the time of the supposed theft, Alsobrook was with this writer working on Ledger business. When confronted with this information, he had no response other than it had to be her.

He further accused her of having pulled a weapon on two women in Granite Shoals. When asked the identity of these women, he refused to disclose it. Why? He had no answer. When I accused him of making wild accusations with no proof and questioned his credibility, again he had no answer. After all, what can a congenital liar say? Yet, NET apparently trusts this liar and has protected him. Most tellingly, he informed me something was going to go down shortly. It certainly, did. NET arrested Alsobrook on Tuesday, October 9.

This piece of human excrement is a NET informant. He provides false information to NET to cover his own cowardly ass. He has placed Alsobrook and others innocent of any wrongdoing in physical and legal jeopardy for his own personal gain. As an informant, the innocent public needs to be protected from this predator. His home address and telephone number are 3264 Hermosa, Kingsland, TX. 78639, (915)388-5641; 614 Link, Kingsland, TX 78639, (915)388-3388. His business is Advanced Marine, 541 Reynolds, Kingsland, TX 78639, (915)388-4842.

Although unrelated to Alsobrook's daughter, Rachel, he has "custody". Why? Good question. The young woman has turned against her mother for reasons unknown. Carolyn, however, was the disciplinarian. Danny was the enabler, funneling cash to the young woman. She is a minor, soon to have turned 18. Always an honors student, she recently failed an advanced placement class. There are allegations Danny has provided the minor with marijuana. Where the hell are the authorities? Good question.

Danny, in front of this writer, has threatened to physically assault Alsobrook's son Dennis should he trespass on "his" property. Readers will recall Dennis had defended his mother during a violent earlier episode years ago, wacking the son of a bitch upside the head with a pool cue. Yet, inexplicably Carolyn Alsobrook has been denied a protective order by County Attorney Cheryll Mabray. O'Leary has also threatened, in front of this writer, to physically assault anyone who attempts to retrieve Carolyn's dog Molly.

Also in front of this writer, O'Leary has physically threatened to kill Michael Smith, a friend of Alsobrook who temporarily provided shelter. O'Leary has also threatened, in front of this writer, to kill David Willard who he has accused of providing Alsobrook with methamphetamines and having had sex with her. Both allegations are false. Interesting, isn't it? Yet, this son of a bitch is a NET informant. This writer has always assumed O'Leary to be wired by NET. All of this should be on tape. Right, Brent?

Interestingly, one of the women O'Leary had accused Alsobrook of pulling a gun on was reportedly Annette Willard, wife of David Willard. Alsobrook claims the incident occurred in her home when both women illegally entered, allegedly looking for tools and equipment belonging to David Willard. Fascinating, isn't it?

Defense attorneys working on drug cases in this area are highly unethical and don't seem to look out for the best interests of their clients. Months ago, a process server working with San Antonio attorney Michael Orbelo approached this writer asking for assistance in the defense of Evaristo Mirelez. An agreement was made to share information. Readers will recall this writer had previously published a series of articles on the Mirelez-NET saga. This writer, however, has no hard evidence and Orbelo and his process server were so informed. Apparently, both wanted confidential information and sources that this writer would not disclose under any circumstances. Even under subpoena.

Additionally, Orbelo wanted this writer to sign an affidavit on behalf of Mirelez indicating he would never receive a fair trial in Llano County. While this was indeed true, doing so would have placed this publication in the position of making news rather than reporting it. This reporter would have been forced to cross the line and unethically become part of the legal process. Needless to say, this writer refused. And always will. Should this writer be subpoenaed, I will sit in a jail cell rather than comply. Certainly would be great fodder for this publication, right, Sam?

Orbelo, distrustful of e-mail, refused direct personal contact, relying on his process server to maintain communication. Interesting, isn't it? Unethically, however, he shared the contents of at least one of this writer's messages with colleague, friend, and former law school classmate Nina Sanchez Willis. Ms. Willis is a former NET prosecutor soundly skewered on this website earlier.

While walking in Burnet, Nina with a seductively beautiful smile had asked if I was Tim Chorney. Not recognizing her from earlier published photographs, I responded yes and asked if I knew her. She replied she was Nina Willis, and that she had been a former NET prosecutor. I had known her as Sanchez and was not aware she had married. She was now a defense attorney and was aware I had skewered her earlier on the website. Once again, I offered her space to respond.

On a second occasion, she offered a ride and we further discussed NET. Most of our conversation is confidential and will not be disclosed. Nina, however, had admitted her professional relationship with Orbelo and provided information only Orbelo could have unethically disclosed from an earlier e-mail of mine. While providing no useful information to me, she unsuccessfully attempted to extract whatever she could.

Readers are reminded NET lost cases when Willis failed to exercise prosecutorial discretion and good judgment. She also falsely claimed both to this writer and others publicly that Oatman does not control NET. Her defense of a glaringly corrupt and abusive prosecutor's office and Narcotics Enforcement Team is clear indication she cannot be trusted. Orbelo was so advised. His failure to produce requested documents and further information regarding the disposition of the Evaristo Mirelez case involving racketeering broke the agreement made with this writer earlier. Seems Evaristo pled to a reduced charge and was sentenced to time served.

By Orbelo's own admission during a meeting held in Burnet, Oatman had nothing. Yet, instead of taking this to court, Orbelo apparently advised a plea bargain. In the best interests of all? Certainly, in Oatman's since he had nothing. In the best interests of Orbelo since he received his pay either way as an appointed attorney. Certainly in the interests of NET since it let them off the hook and spared them further public embarrassment. In the interests of Evaristo? There was no case.

Returning to the Alsobrook arrest by NET, Alsobrook's employer, landscaper Michael Wells, sought legal representation for Alsobrook. Interestingly, Robert Klaeger referred Alsobrook to Nina Sanchez Willis. Hey, Nina? Got the $5000 retainer? Sounds like a lot of money for the alleged offense, doesn't it Counselor? Any possibility of kicking back part of it to NET or the DA, madam? Cost of doing "business"?

Alsobrook claims Willis informed her she was arrested for having cooperated with this publication. If Nina so advised Alsobrook, she is indeed a liar. Alsobrook was not arrested for posting material. She was arrested in an effort to keep her from identifying people involved in the aiding and abetting of fugitive David Willard. Alsobrook was advised from the beginning of her association with this publication, that it was absolutely necessary for her physical safety and issues of legal jeopardy to quickly post all of her material. Otherwise, her life could be in danger or she could be falsely charged in an effort to silence her. Once the information was up, her "threat" to corrupt and abusive officials and their shills would no longer be a pending issue. The damage would have been done, and to go after her subsequently would not have been in the best interests of the criminals who run and own this county.

Worse yet, by dragging her feet, Alsobrook also placed her son and this writer in unnecessary danger. Fear, however, is a driving force in the life of an abused woman. NET and the District Attorney's office outrageously took advantage of this fear to silence her. This is just the beginning of the story. Much more will be posted.

Interestingly, landscaper Michael Wells phoned NET to discuss Alsobrook's particulars. He reported to this writer NET thug Jimmy Hopkins refused to provide public information and had given Wells the impression he was threatening him. He had also threatened Alsobrook during the telephone conversation. Wells asserts as well, the conversation became increasingly threatening as it went on. So what else is new? Hey, Jimmy? How do you sleep nights? You're worse than the "offenders" you falsely incarcerate, you jackass.

Readers are advised this NET goon and piece of shit lied like hell in affidavits presented to JP2 Duane "The Judge" Nobles in the Mirelez cases. Affidavits and "warrants" were outrageously full of errors and omissions and were generated after the fact. Again, what else is new? Readers are reminded Nobles signed the "warrants" willingly and knowingly. Then again, what the hell can be expected from a former Llano County Deputy who beat the hell out of a then 42-year-old Buchanan Dam woman while her hands were cuffed behind her back? ... Right, "Judge"?

Hey, Sam? Cheryll? J.P.? Nathan? Dwight? Brent? Rudy? Duane? And many others? This is only the beginning. There's a hell of a lot more to come. Many are stepping forward. Wells, himself has agreed to provide information regarding his false imprisonment for illegal dumping. The Good Old Boys are advised the shit is about to hit the fan. Should anything happen to this writer, everyone will know who and why. Regardless, life is not so sweet or dear that it should not be risked exposing these thugs for the criminals they clearly are.

The following is a statement from Ms. Alsobrook:

I am innocent and have been falsely accused. Just as I suspected, Danny O'Leary and NET would have falsely accused me and endangered my and my family's life by my arrest and false charges. But how ignorant they must be that I have documentation, witnesses, and other evidence to back up my innocence. If anything happens in the near future including false arrest or harm to my son, daughter or any close friends, I want it known by the readership that NET and the rest of the lying officials in this county are responsible. When you confiscated my vehicle and all my belongings inside, you forgot to mention in the inventory the $100 you kept, the film of evidence of your brutal actions that you took from my camera, and the antique glass case from my grandmother that you shattered. They also took pleasure in twice "keying" my car, a vehicle that everyone knows has been well-taken care of. They claim to have found marijuana in my car. If so, they planted it. After being an abused woman courtesy of Danny O'Leary, what woman would give herself up to unidentified men in unmarked vehicles with no badges, only guns threatening to take her life? There are witnesses to the fact that there was no cause for three hundred pound men to brutally grab me from my vehicle, handcuff me with bleeding wrists, throwing me in one vehicle, within minutes removing me and then shoving me in a second vehicle. ... Me, being a 134 lb. woman. Manly men, no? Is this payback, Brent, for the truth I've posted earlier about you on this website?

Carolyn Alsobrook October 14, 2001

Hey, Sam? How incredibly cowardly of you and your goons. Isn't it my ass you want anyway, "Counselor"? Can't silence this publication legally, so desperately resorting to framing an innocent woman? A woman who has been abused not only by O'Leary, but by corrupt and abusive "officers" under your jurisdiction? ... Wouldn't want the gravy train interrupted, now, would you sir?

You and the County Attorney were unsuccessful in silencing this publication, even going to the extraordinary length of ejecting this writer from public computers in the Llano County Library System. Tough, isn't it? Certainly, no First Amendment in Llano County, is there, sir? Second time you have shit on free speech, no? This time by incarcerating a writer. "Counselor", you have egregiously violated your oath of office, -- repeatedly in this and other matters. You are a disgrace and embarrassment to the community.

Your latest outrageous attempt at intimidation has glaringly failed. There is much more to be posted. Should this writer wind up missing, dead, beaten, or falsely incarcerated, everyone will know who is responsible and why. Indeed, a small price to pay for exposing you and your cronies for what you truly are. Bring it on, Boys.

Tim Chorney, Publisher
The Llano Ledger

Tim Chorney, Publisher
P.O. Box 997
Buchanan Dam Tx. 78609

llanoledger@mailcity.com

Page Updated Mon Oct 15, 2001 12:26pm EDT